“Independent Probe Called For”: Supreme Court In Maharashtra vs Cop Case


The Supreme Court’s comments came on an appeal by the Maharashtra government to stay a Bombay High Court order for a CBI probe into the allegations.

'Independent Probe Called For': Supreme Court In Maharashtra vs Cop Case

It is all hearsay, there is no material evidence, Anil Deshmukh told the Supreme Court today.

New Delhi:

An independent probe is necessary in the matter of former Mumbai police commissioner Param Bir Singh’s allegations of corruption against former Maharashtra Home Minister Anil Deshmukh since both occupied such high positions in the government, the Supreme Court today said. The court observed that the two were even working closely together until they fall apart.

The Supreme Court’s comments came on an appeal by the Maharashtra government to stay a Bombay High Court order for a CBI probe into the allegations.

“The allegations are extremely serious and the persona involved are the Commissioner and Home Minister. In this scenario, will it not be a CBI case?” the court asked.

“Anil Deshmukh did not resign initially (following the allegations being made public). He did so only after High Court directed a probe. It means the Home Minister was clinging on to office,” the top court said. “The person who made allegations was the right hand person of the minister. Let the independent agency look into it. It is hunky dory.”

The court observed that it is a preliminary inquiry at this stage and not one of a “business or political rival” trying to malign Mr Deshmukh.

Appearing for him, senior advocate Kapil Sibal said anyone could make any allegation. “I am not saying there should be no preliminary probe. But get my version on record and decide. Do not bring an outside agency, there are problems. I am vilified without being given chance. Look at the damage it has caused.”

Following the April 5 High Court order for a CBI probe, Mr Deshmukh, a veteran NCP leader from Vidarbha, had resigned from the state government.

When the court asked if an accused could choose the probing agency, Mr Deshmukh said he was neither an accused nor a suspect.

“It is a hearsay statement with no material (evidence). The man, Waze, tells another person and that person tells Bhujbal, and he in turn tells the police commissioner. The commissioner makes the statement after he is shifted out of the position,” Mr Deshmukh argued.

In his March 25 plea, Mr Singh, the former Mumbai police chief, had sought a CBI probe against Mr Deshmukh who, it was alleged, had asked police officers, including suspended cop Sachin Waze, to extort Rs 100 crore from bars and restaurants. Mr Deshmukh has denied any wrongdoing.

Mumbai lawyer Jayshree Patil, on whose writ petition the High Court ordered the probe, on Tuesday filed a caveat in the top court seeking to be heard before any order is passed in the matter.


Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

All the data shown above will be stored by www.rajpostexam.com on https://www.rajpostexam.com/. At any point of time, you can contact us and select the data you wish to anonymise or delete so it cannot be linked to your email address any longer. When your data is anonymised or deleted, you will receive an email confirmation. We also use cookies and/or similar technologies to analyse customer behaviour, administer the website, track users' movements, and to collect information about users. This is done in order to personalise and enhance your experience with us. Click here to read our Cookie Policy.