Tarun Tejpal rape case: The High Court said trial court’s judgment is “like a manual for rape victims” and also does not include the prosecution’s case.
Tarun Tejpal case: High Court posted for June 24 the appeal filed against the trial court order (File).
Panaji:
The Goa bench of the Bombay High Court on Wednesday observed that the sessions court’s judgment acquitting journalist Tarun Tejpal in a 2013 rape case was like a “manual for rape victims” as it goes into how a victim should respond in such cases.
Justice S C Gupte issued a notice to Mr Tejpal and posted for June 24 the appeal filed by the Goa government against the sessions court’s order acquitting him in the case.
The High Court also directed the registry department to call for all papers and other documents related to the case from the sessions court.
“The judgment goes into how she (victim) responded. There are some observations on this. It is like a manual for rape victims,” Justice Gupte said.
The High Court said the judgment also does not include the prosecution’s case.
It (judgment) directly goes into the gist of the case and then the victim’s evidence and statements of witnesses, Justice Gupte said.
“There is a prima facie case to consider the leave (permission) to appeal (against the acquittal). Issue notice to the respondent (Mr Tejpal) returnable on June 24,” the High Court said.
The High Court bench made the remarks when Solicitor General of India Tushar Mehta, appearing for the Goa government, read out portions from the sessions court’s 527-page judgment which, while referring to the victim’s behaviour (both during the alleged incident and afterwards), and said the narrative was of “extreme implausibility”.
“The judgment says the victim, who is an intelligent woman and physically strong as she is a yoga instructor, could have prevented the sexual assault on her,” Mr Mehta said.
On May 21, sessions Judge Kshama Joshi acquitted Tejpal, former editor-in-chief of the Tehelka magazine, in the case where he was accused of sexually assaulting his then colleague in a lift of a five-star hotel in Goa in November 2013 when they were attending an event.
The trial court had in its judgment questioned the woman’s conduct, saying she did not exhibit any kind of “normative behaviour” such as trauma and shock which a victim of sexual assault might plausibly show.
Mr Mehta on Wednesday pointed out to High Court the observations made by the sessions court on how the victim met with eminent women lawyers like Indira Jaising and Rebecca John.
“What is wrong if the victim decided to get legal advice from women lawyers before approaching the court or police?” Mr Mehta said.
The court then noted that the judgment, while referring to Ms Jaising, says the victim had saved her mobile number in her phone under the name “Brahmastra”.
Mr Mehta said all this was irrelevant and hence, should be redacted.
“This will have a pan-India effect as everyone will read the judgment. In future, a victim of sexual assault may hesitate in taking legal advice. There is a portion in the judgment that these lawyers are feminists,” he said, adding that even he is a feminist.
The High Court said it would go into all these issues on the next date of hearing.
“The judgment is already uploaded and is in the public realm. As per our earlier order, all references to the victim’s identity have been redacted from the judgment,” Justice Gupte said.
Mr Mehta further argued that the sessions court’s judgment exhibits complete lack of sensitivity towards crimes against women and absolute lack of knowledge on this subject.
“We don’t know if the victim was on trial or the accused. The entire judgment is as if the victim is on trial. Why should there be so much discussion on the victim’s sexual history,” he said.
The sessions court’s judge has been a mute spectator when the accused’s lawyers brazenly went on to shame the victim, Mr Mehta argued.
(Except for the headline, this story has not been edited by our staff and is published from a syndicated feed.)